博客

  • [组图]英天空电视台等多家媒体对精神迫害现象的

    以下是英国天空电视台、英国卫报、美国公共电视网(PBS)对中国的精神迫害现象进行的报道,期间三家媒体对武汉精神病院受难者胡国红、民生观察工作室刘飞跃等进行了采访,相关内容和网址如下:


     


    A、英国天空电视台的报道:


    网址:http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Chinese-Civil-Rights-Protesters-Dumped-in-Psych-Wards-And-Given-Electric-Shocks/Article/200912215499632?lid=ARTICLE_15499632_ChineseCivilRightsProtestersDumpedinPsychWardsAndGivenElectricShocks&lpos=searchresults


     


    Chinese Protesters Tortured In ‘Black Jails’ Share Share Comments


    12:38pm UK, Monday December 14, 2009


     


    Peter Sharp, Asia correspondent


     


    Civil rights protesters in China are being dumped in psychiatric wards where they are forced to take mind-altering drugs and given electric shocks.


    The treatment is handed out to petitioners – victims of corrupt local governments who have come to the cities to seek justice.


     


    They travel thousands of miles to reach Beijing, but instead of being allowed to voice their grievances they are thrown into illegal “black jails” and many end up placed in mental institutions.


     


    “Pain? You don’t know pain until you have had 220 volts going through your body,” said Hu Guohong, who had come to Beijing to seek compensation for three months’ back pay.


     


    He suffered two hours of electric shock for ten consecutive days.


     


    “My whole insides… it felt like my intestines were turning like clothes put through a washing machine,” he said.


     


    Hu Guohong, petitioner


     


    “There are a lot of people who are locked up there. Just like me, protesters. They round you up and simply dump you in the hospital. If you don’t do what they say, you get electrocuted.”


     


    Sky News gained access to one of the mental institutions and spoke to those behind the bars of an exercise courtyard.


     


    “Some people in here are not even diagnosed with a mental illness. There are all kinds of cases, but most of us are not ill,” one man told us.


     


    Liu Feiyue is a lawyer representing hundreds of those detained.


     


    His home in Wuhan in South China is under surveillance by police and we had to meet secretly late at night.


     


    He says the practice of putting protesters in mental hospitals is widespread.


     


    “They want to stop the protesters from voicing their dissenting views,” he said.


     


    “So they lock them up in mental hospitals. This is becoming a serious epidemic in China.”


     


    Sky News wrote to the Ministry of Justice and the Ministry of Health to ask why mental hospitals were being used as dumping grounds for those seeking justice.


     


    We received no answer.


     


    A spokesman at the Chinese Embassy in London said it was “not in a position to respond in this regard”.


     


     


    B、美国公共电视网(PBS)的报道:


    Chinese Dissidents Committed to Mental Hospitals


     


    网址为:http://www.pbs.org/newshour/bb/asia/july-dec09/china_09-11.html


     


    JIM LEHRER: Next tonight, a diagnosis of mental illness for political dissidents in China. Special correspondent Shannon Van Sant has our Global Health Unit story. She has reported from China for our PBS colleagues at the “Nightly Business Report,” among other programs.


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: Qin Xinan is a long way from home. He has traveled from Wuhan, 700 miles away in central China, to Beijing, where he stays in this one-room shack. Every morning, he goes to government offices, pleading for help.


     


    QIN XINAN, petitioner: I strongly ask Hu Jintao and the Chinese Communist Party Central Committee to punish corruption. Save Chinese people, ordinary people, the weak in society. Save China.


     


    I’m not only standing on my own ground. I speak for thousands of people who get persecuted as mentally ill patients.


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: A former officer in the People’s Liberation Army, Qin has been forcibly hospitalized six times, accused of being mentally ill. He says he’s not the only one with grievances who’s been treated that way.


     


    QIN XINAN: The first time the diagnosis was acute stress disorder. The second time was paranoid schizophrenia. The third time, just like all the other petitioners, doctors diagnosed me with paranoid psychosis.


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: Qin’s journey began when he came to Beijing to complain about corruption in the factory he worked in. He was a petitioner, one of thousands who come here to seek redress from the central Chinese government for various wrongs, from land seizures to mistreatment by police.


     


    Once in the capital, they stay in makeshift petitioners’ villages, like this one. China’s petitioning system dates back to the Ming Dynasty 700 years ago, when people appealed for help from the imperial court if they had problems with local officials.


     


    When I visited this neighborhood, petitioners quickly approached, telling me their stories. Within minutes, I was spotted by security officers who marched me out of the neighborhood. When I tried to leave, people surrounded my taxicab, showing me copies of their petitions.


     


    China’s emphasis on social harmony provides an incentive for petitioners to press for justice, but it also sets the stage for their persecution. That’s because petitioners know that Chinese officials in the central government take unrest in local communities seriously, but the local officials who are being complained about will often seek retribution or try to stop people from petitioning in the first place.


     


    Teng Biao, a professor at the University of Politics and Law in Beijing, says the system itself creates these kinds of problems. He runs an NGO to provide legal aid to petitioners.


     


    TENG BIAO, University of Politics and Law, Beijing: From the top down, the petitioning situation is an assessing index for the officials on their political achievements. If there are many petitioners coming to Beijing from a place, then it will affect the local officials on their promotions and bonuses.


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: For his work, Teng Biao had his lawyers license and passport taken away. After this interview, Chinese authorities shut down Teng Biao’s NGO, and police detained two of his colleagues. Despite the risk, Teng said he will continue his work.


     


    I traveled to Wuhan to talk with another Chinese activist, Liu Feiyue, but he was under house arrest. Liu heads an NGO that is currently following 100 cases of wrongful psychiatric detention. Over the last three years, he says he knows of 500 more whistleblowers and protesters who have been detained in mental hospitals.


     


    Robin Munro, who has extensively researched psychiatric detention in China and written two books on the topic, thinks the practice is widespread.


     


    ROBIN MUNRO, human rights activist: China’s experience in this area is far more serious and extensive than any other country.


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: Munro, who is based in Hong Kong, believes that since there are no national mental health laws protecting the rights of people who have been compulsorily hospitalized, but there are rules limiting arbitrary arrest, hospitals are becoming a convenient means of silencing protesters.


     


    ROBIN MUNRO: Once diagnosed in this way, as dangerously mentally ill, citizens have no rights. They have no legal right to see a lawyer; they have no legal right to be brought before a judge so that a judicial determination can be made.


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: The Chinese press, including the Beijing News, has reported on the hospitalizations. The story was picked up by the state’s official press agency, The People’s Daily and Sina.com, where it drew 23,000 comments. Such coverage in Chinese newspapers could imply there is central government support for preventing wrongful psychiatric detention by local officials.


     


    China’s Ministry of Health denied requests for an interview, but sent a list of relevant regulations on treatment of the mentally ill, which said, in part, “The diagnosis of psychiatric disease is, according to the Chinese mental disorder category and diagnosis standard third edition, approved by Chinese medical association and referring to the related standards of international disease diagnosis category.”


     


    When asked at a press conference about the increasing numbers of protesters being put in mental hospitals, the spokesperson for the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said…


     


    QIN GANG, Spokesperson, Ministry of Foreign Affairs (through translator): It’s the first time for me to hear the situation you addressed. I don’t know about the situation of psychiatric hospitals, but please believe the related Chinese governmental departments conduct administration according to law.


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: But in Wuhan, another petitioner, Hu Guohong, said he has been forcibly hospitalized in mental institutions four times and that he and his wife, Cheng Xue, have been warned repeatedly by local officials to stop petitioning.


     


    HU GUOHONG, petitioner: They said, “We don’t allow you to go petitioning to the upper levels. If you do that, we will beat you to death.”


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: Since the couple is under police surveillance, I met them at a hotel room late at night. They showed me a list, with thumbprint signatures, of fellow petitioners who have been detained in Wuhan’s psychiatric hospitals.


     


    Hu said, when he complained about being owed back-pay for his work constructing railroad cars, he was beaten by the factory’s security team. After Hu demanded compensation for his injuries, police put him in the Wuhan Ankang Psychiatric Hospital for three days.


     


    Since then, doctors have diagnosed him with schizophrenia and paranoia. Police often arrest him before major events, as they did before the Olympics.


     


    HU GUOHONG: They gave me one, and then two yellow pills every day. They said they would set me free after the Olympics. They told me to be nice. But after the Olympics and during the Paralympics, they still held me. At the end of September, I escaped. They caught me, and the next day they gave me electric shocks.


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: The shocks were administered with electrified needles that pierced the feet, the palms of his hands, and his temples.


     


    HU GUOHONG: The electric shocks continued for two hours of high voltage.


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: He’s been detained twice since then, including just after I interviewed him, which was five days before the anniversary of the government’s crackdown in Tiananmen Square. He was kept in a hospital for 12 days.


     


    ROBIN MUNRO: Whenever there’s a big — there’s a crackdown of some kind going on in the country, a political crackdown or the Olympics are coming up, a huge international event, then the police will be instructed to go out and preemptively detain anyone who might stage an embarrassing incident to the government in the run-up to these crucial events. And people on the list who are mentally ill — or allegedly mentally ill — are among the first people that will be preemptively detained.


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: Despite the dangers, many petitioners refuse to give up. Qin Xinan says he’ll stay in Beijing as long as he can, petitioning for help.


     


    QIN XINAN: I have been to Beijing 133 times. I have no other way. My family is destroyed. I wander the streets of Beijing. I am a 60-year-old man begging for food and asking the government for justice, to right a wrong.


     


    SHANNON VAN SANT: But he expects to be arrested by the end of the summer, before the anniversary of the founding of the People’s Republic of China on October 1st.


     


    JIM LEHRER: And since that report was produced, the Chinese government has cracked down further on activists. For the first time, they’ve issued a regulation banning petitioners from traveling to Beijing.


     


     


    C、英国卫报


     


    China accused of holding woman in mental hospital for challenging officials


     


    网址:http://www.guardian.co.uk/world/2010/aug/31/china-mental-hospital-liao-meizhi


     


    They snatched Liao Meizhi on her birthday, dragging her off the street and into a dirty blue van as others held back her husband.


     


    It was only two months later, when a stranger knocked on the door, that her family learned where she had been taken. The man said he had just been discharged from a nearby mental hospital – and that Liao was being held there against her will. Her husband insists she has no psychiatric problems.


     


    More than six months after she was seized, her family says she remains incarcerated in the nondescript building with thick steel doors just outside her hometown of Qianjiang, in China’s central Hubei province.


     


    Researchers believe she is among a growing number of people wrongly detained in psychiatric institutions after clashing with local officials. One activist has compiled a database of more than 500 such cases.


     


    Some victims have been held for a decade. Those freed describe being forcibly treated – with electro-convulsive therapy and powerful anti-psychotic drugs – for health problems they never had.


     


    “In the last few years you have been seeing more and more cases involving petitioners and whistle blowers – ‘the awkward squad’ – [often when] the authorities have tried other punishments or sanctions to make them stop and nothing else has worked,” said Robin Munro, author of China’s Psychiatric Inquisition and a research associate at SOAS law school. “Finally they really try to scare them to hell by putting them in mental hospitals.”


     


    There is historical precedent: from the 60s to the 80s, some types of dissidence were regarded as evidence of mental illness and therefore “treatable” via incarceration. “[But] from the late 80s it has been 100% expediency, designed to punish or silence someone – or both. It’s incredibly easy to do and extremely convenient,” said Munro.


     


    Liao had tussled with local officials for nine years over her father-in-law’s pension. In the last three she travelled to Beijing four times to raise her family’s grievance with central government. Each time, local authorities seized and returned her. Her husband Yang Chunguang said she was sent to black jails – unofficial detention houses – and beaten. His photos show huge, livid bruises upon Liao’s arms and legs. After one such incident, he said, he agreed to admit her to the Qianjiang mental hospital because officials threatened to harm her otherwise. A doctor diagnosed Liao’s “paranoia”, with the admission form citing “delusions of persecution”. The evidence: she “believed she had been attacked; petitioned for [many] years”.


     


    Liao was released two days later. Soon she was petitioning again.


     


    The family thought it had finally resolved its dispute this winter. But in January four thugs launched a serious assault on Liao as she shopped in a local market.


     


    The couple were convinced it was related to the row and went to authorities to complain as soon as Liao had recovered. As they left the government offices, around a dozen men snatched her. Her husband believes he recognised two of her assailants from the health department. But the office denied involvement and police refused to register his complaint.


     


    Even when Yang learnt of Liao’s incarceration, the Yanshi mental hospital denied it was holding her. It took six visits before it allowed him to see her, for around 15 minutes.


     


    His normally loquacious wife, who had been an actor and singer in her youth, was subdued. “Her whole face and head were swollen, probably from crying too much,” he said. “She said ‘I didn’t think I would end up here’. They treated her like a prisoner.”


     


    He has not seen her since that visit in April. “She is the cornerstone of the family. I want her back, soon, so we can go back to normal life,” he said.


     


    But Liu Feiyue of Civil Rights and Livelihood Watch, who monitors such cases, warned that the effects of incarceration are lasting. “Many victims suffer long term depression and struggle after their release. When they return to society, they experience discrimination,” he said.


     


    Munro fears that pressure to curb other forms of arbitrary detention has led some officials to turn to psychiatric institutions, where they face few awkward questions. China does not have a mental health law; there are no admission hearings and no rights to legal counsel or a second opinion.


     


    Piecemeal regulations stipulate that admission requires a psychiatric evaluation showing individuals are a risk to themselves or others and the approval of their legal guardians – almost always close relatives – or police officers who believe they have committed or will commit a crime.


     


    Even these inadequate criteria are frequently ignored, say researchers.


     


    “Hospitals get orders from higher government bodies to take patients. Then they will prefer not to do tests,” said Liu.


     


    Asked about Liao, the head nurse at Yanshi mental hospital said she could not comment due to patient confidentiality and hung up. The city’s police did not respond to faxed questions.


     


    An employee at Qianjiang health department, who did not give her name, said: “Yes, we took her because she is mentally ill.”


     


    But following further questions, she claimed: “We didn’t take her. We don’t know anything.”


     


    With no time limit on detention, and no appeals, hospitals need not release patients until or unless they choose.


     


    “There is not much to be done about it,” said Huang Xuetao, a Shenzhen-based lawyer who has acted for several detainees.


     


    Without legal means of resolution, he appeals to whoever ordered detention and asks the media for help. “Sometimes it works,” he said. “Sometimes it makes it worse.”


     


     


    Other casesHuman rights groups and Chinese media have documented numerous cases of psychiatric detention being abused.


     


    Earlier this year the Southern Daily reported that Xu Lindong of Luohe in Henan province spent six years in a mental hospital for petitioning and helping other petitioners. Xu told Reuters that he was forced to take drugs and was given electric shocks.


     


    Civil Rights and Livelihood Watch reported that Wang Suiling from Nanyang in from Henan province had been forcibly detained seven times, given injections and forced to swallow pills after petitioning over a fraud case.


     


    Last year the Chinese Human Rights Defenders network reported that two sisters from Yunxi in Hebei province, Jin Hanyan and Jin Hanqin, were forcibly held in a mental hospital after petitioning.


     


    They were released in April this year.


     


    In 2008 the Beijing News reported that at least 18 people were bringing complaints against authorities after being held in a mental hospital in Xintai, Shandong province against their will.


     


    秦鑫安


     


     


    胡国红


     


     

  • 中秋月圆毛恒凤欲与家人团圆难上加难

     


    2010年2月25日,毛恒凤自从这次遭受非法利用公权力的打压下,至今已被关押整整7个月以来,上海监管场所及安徽省女劳教所均无安排毛恒凤与其家人会见,作为毛恒凤的家人曾许多次以书面和当面或电话形式,分别向上海市杨浦区政府、杨浦区公安分局、上海市劳教工作管理局、安徽省劳教工作管理局、女劳教所等,相关各部门反映及提出会见要求等诸多合法诉求,遗憾的是上述各部门对此却毫无音讯。也就是说,这些相关部门对上述信访事项,都没能按照现行的信访条例及相关规定办理与处理,犹其是安徽省女劳教所既不安排毛恒凤与家人的会见,又不对其家人作出不予安排会见的合法理由的说明。不仅如此,它们除了在肉体上继续对毛恒凤实施摧残外,更加重了在精神对毛恒凤及其家人们的折磨。它们妄想通过各种卑劣、残酷的手段,一而再、再而三地对毛恒凤实施严酷的打击迫害,企图以此违法的适用法方来达到动摇,以致消除毛恒凤为不懈地维权的坚定信念:它们所实行一系列的丑恶行径,完全与现今所提倡的人性化与和谐理念格格不入,甚至已趋对立!另一方面它们又害怕毛恒凤与家人见面时,会勇敢地揭露监管场所对其所实施的种种不可告人的罪恶勾当,特别是对其滥施酷刑虐行至极。俗话说:“若要人不知,除非己莫为”!


    中秋节来临毛恒凤也思念她的亲人,思念三个女儿、丈夫、朋友,同时亲人朋友也在思念她,为她人身安危担忧。在饱受痛苦的亲人,为她的身体状况担忧,为她的生命安危担忧。


    时值全球华人的传统中秋佳节,这是团圆的佳节,但是团圆对于毛恒凤和家人来说,如今已经变成了一种难以达到的“奢求”。俗话说:“每逢隹节倍思亲”,又由于长时间缺少出之毛恒凤的信息,这让我们更加想念。毛恒凤在劳教所受尽迫害,一次从劳教所中给家人的信中写道:“受尽迫害失去自由”,“生不如死”。


     


    与此同时,上海维权民众们发起了:为上访遭受迫害的劳教、劳改人员送去中秋节的问候,以中秋节送月饼聊表心意,即“每逢隹节倍思亲,大墙内外思亲人”。同年9月19日,我们寄往安徽女子劳教所送毛恒凤的月饼,却被该劳教所拒收退回。今夜,虽然只隔“一墙”之间,在中秋佳节的思念中,我们都将拥有这轮相同的明月,皎洁、明亮……。面对这样的皓月当空,大墙外的人势必都会思念与牵挂无辜身系囹圄者,我们许久没有联络在大墙之内的朋友,特别是毛恒凤女士!


     


    由于现实社会的不公,虽然使我们暂时无法共同渡过佳节,团聚的家人是欢乐的,但骨肉被分割是痛苦的,但我们思念亲人、思念维权战线挚友们的心一刻不变,望着空中的明月,谁还能把月饼咽下去?正是这个社会太缺乏人性化,所以才会残酷不仁至极!


     


    在这21世纪的开始,对我们仍然笼罩着无尽的悲哀。我们维权民众们怨恨!在当今社会不公中为维护自身正当的合法权益,为追求自由、民主与和平却要付出如此巨大和惨烈的代价,这是法律的悲哀,民族的悲哀,也是全世界人类社会的悲哀!


     


    上海维权民众签名:吴雪伟、沈佩兰、金月花、赵迪迪、高信翠、焦东海、孙建敏、王承起、王扣玛、王志华、徐金芳、秦来发、詹荣妹、沈纯理、江莉、王文正。


     


    2010-9-21


     

  • 艾滋病维权人士田喜案开庭引发又一轮民间维权

    民生观察工作室2010年9月21日消息:今天上午,河南艾滋病维权人士田喜所谓“故意毁坏财物”案在河南上蔡法院开庭审理。庭审于上午九点开始,至中午12点30分左右结束,法庭未当庭宣判。


     


    今天的开庭引来全国各地的网友、维权人士和民间组织的关注和声援。来旁听或围观的民间组织,除湖北的女权工作室的叶海燕、北京德先生研究所的高健、北京爱知行的江天勇外,包括平顶山血友病组织红梅、信阳的感染者组织青竹林、郑州巩义的康乐家园、新蔡的农民健康小组。


     


    维权人士许志永、何杨、周莉、叶海燕,还有从郑州赶来的蓝无忧等纷纷到场“围观“。


     


    这又是中国民间一次自发的集体维权行动,官方再次采取了阻止与打压的错误做法。中国艾滋病工作民间组织联席会议发布消息说,该组织委派的二名理事去上蔡县参加今天早上新蔡县法院对田喜案的庭审,其中一名理事朱龙伟被不明身份的人带走,手机被收交,通讯中断,下落不明。而维权人士许志永、何杨遭人粗暴对待。


     


    据田喜的父亲讲述,田喜于2010年7月23日在北京接到新蔡县县委书记贾国印的短信要他星期一到办公室谈解决问题。田喜如约,但贾书记未出现。随后贾书记又发短信称下个星期一见。田喜8月2日又如约,结果贾书记又不见人。而此时田喜所带艾滋病药快服用完,于是便到新蔡县第一人民医院,见到李俊州院长,希望借点药,并要求医院赔偿。李院长称有事找县领导,医院不管,起身离开了办公室。一怒之下,田喜将办公桌上的东西推到地上。5号和6号田喜先后两次再到医院,李院长锁门不让进,田喜便将锁眼堵上。


     


    田喜家在河南省驻马店市新蔡县古吕镇,1996年他9岁时因在新蔡县第一人民医院输血而感染艾滋病。在北京念完大学,成为艾滋病维权骨干的田喜近年因上访多次被抓,田喜一直是当地政府的“稳控对象”,而他近期连续两次在北京上访,给当地政府带来很大麻烦,因此民众怀疑田喜的案子能否得到公正的审理。


     


     


     


     


     


     

  • 北京野靖环等六位访民在上海被抓

    民生观察工作室2010年9月21日消息:今天上午十一点左右,北京野靖环等六位访民乘车到达上海后,二十多位上海警察、便衣便冲进车厢,将六人拖下火车。随即,六人被塞进汽车,车子很快开上高速公路。几位访民连饭也不给吃,厕所也不准上即被抓走。


     


    野靖环是”新国大”期货诈骗案的受害人,多年来她们一直为此讨说法未果。

  • 北京女律师王宇被判刑两年半

    民生观察工作室2010年9月21日消息:今天上午天津铁路运输法院宣判,以王宇过失致人重伤罪,判有期徒刑两年六个月。


     


    王宇案起因于2008年5月4日,北京女律师王宇前往天津西站迎接朋友到来,在候车室入口因接站站台票问题而与4名铁路工作人员发生争执,并被打伤。随之她向铁路警方报警,被带到天津西站派出所问话做笔录。王宇作为受害人,要求警察把其他当事人叫来对质,竟遭到警察拒绝。于是,愤懑的王宇去医院疗伤前,先去了天津铁路公安处督察队,投诉“民警执法不公”。 


     事隔7个月后的2008年12月9日,王宇接到天津西站派出所警察约谈,王宇前往时居然被以涉嫌“故意伤害罪” 于2008年12月10日被刑事拘留,23日被批捕。 


     

  • 四川“链子门”案9月28日将宣判

    民生观察工作室2010年9月21日消息:据马小朋律师证实,包括四川维权人士黄晓敏在内的、鲍俊生、刘继伟、曾理、杨久荣、曾荣康、徐崇丽、严文汉、幸清贤、陆大春等近10人的所谓聚众扰乱社会秩序罪一案,将于9月28日上午9点半在四川省乐山市市中区法院宣判。


     


    今年2月23日在成都中级法院门口,数十冤民铁链锁手举着写有“冤”字纸牌要求司法公正,后来许多冤民及维权人士被当局抓走,该案被称为“链子门”案。


     


     

  • [图文]湖北金汉琴高烧住院疑与被关精神病院有关

    民生观察工作室2010年9月21日消息:据湖北省十堰市精神病院受难者金汉艳昨天给本工作室打来电话说,她此前同样被关精神病院的妹妹金汉琴近期被送医。到今天,金汉琴还在医院内。


     


    金汉艳说,半个月前,金汉琴发高烧被送往郧西县当地医院。到医院后,金汉琴又在医院内烧了十多天,并发觉头昏等诸多症状。金汉艳、金汉琴姐妹认为,金汉琴这次发病是因为她被关精神病院期间被长期强迫吃药造成的。金汉艳多次与郧西县政府交涉,要求支付妹妹的医药费被拒。


     


    金汉艳、金汉琴是湖北十堰市郧西县土门镇六官坪村人,94年姐妹俩同时参加高考并被丹江农校录取。97年毕业后,二人满心希望有一份固定工作却因被他人冒名顶替失去机会。为此,二人走上了上访的不归路。2009年8月,金汉艳、金汉琴姐妹又到了北京,在北京做了一段时间的钟点工后,2009年9月18日下午5点左右郧西县公安局邓和敏、徐建波等四人将姐妹两人在北京寿宝庄出租房内控制,随即给她们拷上手铐带到十堰市驻京办。9月19日郧西县公安局邓和敏以“非法限制叶战平人身自由”为由将金汉琴关押在郧西县看守所,金汉艳押在郧西县神风宾馆。9月22日金汉琴、金汉艳分别被郧西县土门镇陈明山等人强行送到东风汽车公司茅箭医院(十堰市精神病医院)和十堰市红十字医院(惠民医院)精神病科。


     


    在外界和媒体的关注下,姐妹俩在被关了210天后走出了精神病院。2010年6月11日,她们正式向十堰市中院提起诉讼,控告郧西县政府、郧西县公安局、郧西县土门镇政府。让她们“惊喜”的是,2010年6月25日,十堰市中院通知受理了该案。但是到了8月,姐妹俩又收到了十堰市中院驳回起诉的裁定书,驳回时间是7月19日。


     


    金汉琴


     

  • 张振新:护宪倡议书

    保护宪法,捍卫国法是每个中华人民共和国公民的职责与义务。


    国法宪法,是全国人民代表大会根据国情与人民利益意愿制定,实施的权威行为规则,她,是国家与人民的约定,她,告诉人民应做什么,不该做什么,做什么负什么责任,做什麽受什么处罚,公民拥有什么权力,应尽什么义务,享受什么待遇。在中华人民共和国土地上的人都应无条件遵守—-中华人民共和国法律。【中华人民共和国公民或其它国籍的】都不得逾越,违背,破坏。国法宪法应象珠穆朗玛的冰雪洁白无暇,不能玷污,不得扭曲,不要亵渎,不许践踏,更不准强奸,轮奸,蹂躏,猥亵。


    社会变革为一切向钱看的公权寻租者提供了难得的机遇。司法腐败,执法者枉法象荆棘在中国这片沃土上疯长。为个人利益违背国家人民意愿,使养育生命,人民赖依生存的农田不能为人民提供救命的食粮,失望与无奈成了茶余饭后街头巷尾的主要话题。很多人被执法机构腐败搞的恐惧不安,精神恍惚,竟不知什么是执法,什么是犯罪了。 国法明确规定的犯法,犯罪,被有的执法机构说【执法】;遵纪守法的说犯法,犯罪。维权人被传讯,拘留,劳教,判刑成了家常便饭。一个自己觉得对国法很精通的人,在街上被抓进派出所,快到二十四小时,才喊:超过二十四小时你们就犯法了,难道无缘无故被抓,被囚禁不够二十四小时就合法?翻阅公权持有者的字典只有两个字:执法。打开人民的字典四个字:犯法,犯罪。人民有时不知执法机构执的是什么法,与国法差距太大,还有挑战国法的,人民不理解,执法者可以不尊重当事人,蔑视国法,不尊重国法是执法吗?颠倒黑白的【执法】快把人民的肚子气爆了,人民气愤的说这哪是和谐社会,这是河蟹社会,喝血社会。投诉没满意答复,不妥善处理,从信任依赖到怀疑,向信任危机演变,正向仇恨,敌对发展。残酷的现实使人民终于明白以国法为依据过时了,以权力为准绳才现实。公权持有者手中的标尺是孙悟空金箍棒升级材料制做的,既有超级伸缩力,又有极强柔韧性,根据人的地位,能力,家庭背景,人事关系既可以无限拉长,又可以任意收缩,可以o型,可以u型,也可以s型,还可以z型, 地位不同,结果准不一样,有靠山的和没人的同一件事,两种结局。公权力私有化,少数持有者随心所欲,为所欲为,人民是继续忍受,还是说不,是讨论的重点。以国法为基础执法,国法至上,还是以权力支配法律,权力至尊,是商讨的核心。怎样使公权力正义,怎样制止公权力失公,真正为民众,为社会服务,是磋商的目的。


    报纸,广播,电视,执法机关都宣传法律面前人人平等,其实人人都知道公权持有者看人下菜碟儿。谁保护国法,谁破坏国法?谁爱国法,谁恨国法?谁盼国法,谁怕国法?谁要依法办事,谁不依法行事是目前人民关心的焦点。公权力帮助弱者享受中华人民共和国公民的权力,还是帮助强者蚕食弱者;是退回原始社会,还是步入现代文明与世界同步?法制在完善,还是越来越差?亲眼看到的,亲耳听到的,亲身经历的人有话说?在人类越来越文明的今天,有着五千多年文明史的中国,让人糊涂了。


    国法应刚性,谁敢触犯它,谁就付出代价。国法应是制止公权持有者违法的利剑,斩去失公部分,使其公正,有序,铁面无私但在有的部门成了皮筋尺,对无权无势的百姓柺多少弯也要与有罪连上,他们规定不让说的话,说了就是犯法;对有权有势的既是犯罪也不敢碰,老太太吃柿子捡软的捏,何况聪明的【执法者】。抢人财产,拆他人住房【是执法,】不是犯罪?保护自己财产住房是犯法犯罪?国法被搞得成了套在贫民百姓脖子上的枷锁,他们怎么拽,人民怎麽受。


    公权私有化,公权人情,公权失公使有的执法机构发生了质的变化,由化解社会矛盾的工具,成了社会矛盾制造厂,催化剂。宪法不如村官的话,是普遍存在的事实,犯法与执法混肴,犯罪与执法颠倒,将人民弄迷糊了,明明悖宪法国法,大喊特喊执法,公权持有者只有执法,没有犯法,犯罪,人民的呐喊,社会的波动,没有任何作用。明明是遵纪守法说犯法,拘留,劳教还没办法,投诉,上访只能给受害人更大伤害。国法不是儿戏,不是婴儿裤子,开档方便,整裆也行。不是随意改的变形金刚,公权持有者对自己有利时就依法,没利时就不依法,大大削弱了国法效力与权威,影响了国法在人民心中的地位与形象。执法者犯法,违法,已成社会矛盾的主要来源,对国家危害之大,是人人心知肚明的秘密。上级明知下级犯法能管,不管;手无寸铁的百姓想管,管不了。人民不是餐桌上的羔羊,想吃哪割哪。人民也是人,与公权持有者同类,也是中华人民共和国的成员,也纳税。中华人民共和国宪法,国法保护中华人民共和国公民是它的责任,中华人民共和国公民享受中华人民共和国宪法,国法保护,是每个公民的权力,任何人没有逾越国法剥夺他人权力的特权。


    杀人偿命,欠债还钱是世界共同遵守的规则和法律,几年前我在北京市人民政府前,看到一人举着【杀人升官】的牌子,前几天又看见了,人命关天,是他诬陷人,还是有此事没人管?我在最高人民法院前,看到有人在衣服上写着【中国没法】。有人在自己脸上写着【冤】字,中国真没法吗?用石子在公权持有者的汽车上划一下,试试。人民当家做了主人,干部是人民的公仆。一个主人看到仆人的车停在哪儿,与仆人说他的冤情,劳教一年。


    翻开国法,从母法宪法到各子法都写着保护人民生命与财产,还有专门保护人民财产的物权法,北京有一人,手拿宪法保护自己住房,还有媒体介入,结果住房仍被强拆【执法】。蚁有穴,鸟有巢,蜂有窝。蜜蜂明知蜇后死,但为了保护自己窝,为其它蜂生存死也要蜇入侵者。小鸟为保护自己巢,竟敢与天敌拼命。蚂蚁为了保护自己的穴,竟一批一批战死——–只有中国公民保护自己住房是【犯法犯罪】,可怜那些被【执法】的【犯法犯罪】者,只能露宿街头。人们惊奇的发现,强拆他人住房的人群里,往往有两劳人和当地地痞,被强拆的大多数是遵纪守法人。真正违章的很少,有合法居住权的绝对多数。有人形容国家像高楼大厦,它是【人民】砖瓦组成的,现在有那麽多的砖瓦,离开瓦工码放地,去哭诉———这个高楼叫危楼更确切。它能抵御汶川地震,舟曲泥石流吗?


    中国不是没法,中国目前的法条足够用的,法条制订在好,再多,再全,再细有制定没有执行,对人民有用吗?法条写的与实际做的不符,国法对人民如同水中月,画中饼,着得见,不解饿,不充饥还好,人民最怕言行不一,嘴上说帮你,实际在害你。既得利益们将国家委托,正义呼唤,人民祈盼于不顾,为金钱舍国家,为私利抛弃正义,为得利不管他人死活,出卖国家法律,出卖手中权力,出卖正义,出卖他人利益,挥动手中工具,挖高楼大厦的砖瓦,换取———-公权持有者拿着纳税人的俸禄,肩负着国家人民的重托,承担着维护国法尊严,权威,国家安危,人民安全的重担。司法腐败正威胁着国家安定,社会和谐,人民的生命财产,其根源就是宪法国法遭破坏。为了国家稳定,人民安全,为了更多的人正常生活,工作,为下一代——保护宪法,捍卫国法吧。护宪是抑制腐败的疫苗,是挽救性命地仙丹妙药,是保护生命的天神,看管财产的金刚。公民们只有人人护宪,人民才能正常工作,生活,只有护宪人民才能法律面前人人平等,只有护宪国家才能安定,社会才能和谐,公民们只有护宪————-


     


     


                 护宪倡议人张振新                联系电话86964359


             北京西城西什库大街七十六号               2010-9-21


    支持护宪的请签上您的姓名:北京张雪竹,

  • [组图]湖北随州何店居民吴忠全的申冤书

    我叫吴忠全,男,58岁,何店三岔河村人,住三岔河村四组102号。


     


    我家三口人,两子女在外打工。我从事农活,早出晚归,住在自建的两间两层楼房内,生活悠然自得。然而,自杨学林2009年8月在未与我协商,又未经规划局批准的情况下,在我西侧违建三间四层房屋后,我家再无宁日了。


     


    杨学林家四层楼房的基脚压在我的二层楼房的基脚上,其墙体距我家墙体最近处只有8公分,致使我的楼房自东向西沉降、崩裂,裂缝达11条之多。此房已成危房,且损坏在继续发展中。我住在里面,惶惶不可终日。


     


    房屋损坏后,我于2009年11月向杨提出赔偿,杨置之不理。此时,我女已辞掉在外的工作回家参与维权。可怜一弱女子,四处奔告,上下求情。在侵权人面前哀求,向村及镇领导哭诉。可杨学林却说,不是他家损坏的,官员们则说修复了即可。数月来,可怜我女筋疲力尽,而我也日忧愁、夜难眠,精神损害已致我心脏病等多种疾病发作住院治疗。真是屋内又逢连阴雨。


     


    吴忠全


     


    2010-9


     


     


    申冤书


     


    损坏的墙壁

  • [图文]四川三台甲级伤残军人梁上桓在信访局遭受

       我,梁上桓,男,汉族,中共党员,生于1957年12月26日,四川省三台县人,住乐加乡场镇。


      我陈述要求政府主持调解我与邻里杨金兰之间的邻里侵权纠纷,而遭到县政府信访工作人员和警察的殴打,导致腰5椎体向前滑移0.3cm的事实经过。若有虚假,我自愿接受国家法律制裁。


      我2008年5月28日购买杨秀珍坐落于三台县乐加乡供销社经理部房屋并签订协议,2008年12月19日,邻居杨金兰修房,妄想侵占我购买的房屋宅基地,在挖基础时伤及我家墙基,导致我居住的房屋成危房,随时有伤及我及我家人的生命、财产安全。近一年的时间,杨金兰不思补救,仅是用木棒支撑。但长期下去,我家房屋将会垮塌,为了排除危险,消除险情,保证我及家人的居住安全,2010年6月24日申请三台县乐加乡人民政府调解,三台县乐加乡人民政府在调解后只是叫我去法院打官司,叫我告杨金兰。我到法院打官司无钱请律师,申请法律援助,三台县法律援助中心工作人员告诉我,我这是邻里纠纷,应该找政府出面解决,不打官司。


    2010年7月15日我到县政府反映情况,陈述我一个伤残军人的房屋,现是危房,无法居住,要求解决。民政局干部当天打了电话给副乡长林兆伦。民政局干部说“你回家去,由乡上出面处理好。”我回家后,乡人民政府无人协调解决,我多次去找他们乡政府领导干部,他们说“要国土、村建到齐才能解决,杨金兰不到场不拿出他的房产土地手续,我们政府无法。”我见继续找乡政府解决也无希望,2010年7月21日恰逢三台县人民政府赵飚县长接待群众之日,我就到了三台县人民政府信访局,按照信访程序我申请登记,等待县长接见,到中午11点过都没等到,一直到下午两点上班,我又等到四点,县村建国土领导才接见了我,问了我的情况,我也将相关手续交给了接待领导看,他们接待我后,就叫我去找赵飚县长签字批文。我就将反映的材料交与信访办公室主任廖恩。廖恩交与赵飚,赵飚未接见我本人就签字了。赵飚县长的签字我看都没有看到,廖恩就叫我回去了,按程序等待解决。我认为这又是拖到不给我解决,我对廖恩说“赵县长的批示,我亲自带回去找他们,头几次也是县领导批了,我们至今未见到批文,旦一直拖到没解决我们的事”我要赵县长批示,廖恩也没有给我,就放到一个姓李的女同志办公室,我就没有走,一定要拿到手续,廖恩及工作人员说”你实在要,我们把你反映材料给你,赵县长批示就要撕掉“,我就不同意,姓李的女工作人员就撕掉了赵县长的批示,我之妻李琼华拿了一般在手里,另一半姓李的女工作人员就扯烂了。


      我一个伤残人,也没办法,回家又没有车了,住旅店身上只有8元钱,钱不够,又无饭钱,我们只好在信访大厅等到2010年7月22日,并且向他们讲明了我没有钱住店,回家又没有车,只好在信访大厅将就住一晚上,等到第二天。他们信访局的一个高姓工作人员,是个什么长,就强行叫我出来,我没有出来,他死拖我出来,拉我手,扭我右手,致我右胳膊都是肿的。他又报警,警察到场后,我讲明了情况,他们就走了。一会儿,一名警察转来对我说”你没有钱,我们向你们乡上打了电话,他们来接你们了。“后来就走了,等了一个多小时,信访局工作人员也没有走,在办公室外面,我感觉我右手胳膊特别痛,是红肿的,就打110求救,但无人来,我又打电话到绵阳市110,未打通,后又打省公安厅110,省公安厅转到三台县公安局,县公安局110问了情况,也没有提说我的手伤了去治疗,他们问了情况就走了。


      我等到大约7点过,我见我们乡副乡长何旭勇到群工局窗外看了一眼,就和群工局干部走了。


      八点过钟的样子,群工局主任廖恩带了三个警察,两个警察有警服,一个穿的便衣,叫我们出去,先是将信访群众蒋素珍、王德仁、唐金义及家属,我的妻子李琼华强行驱逐出信访大厅。我还仍在信访大厅的椅子上坐着,接着他们把信访大厅的门关上,把灯也关了,就留有两个警察,一个不是警察的人,廖恩也在场,强行叫我出去,第一个冲到我前面的是廖恩,他抓住我的手往外拖,两个警察一左一右挟着我往外走,从信访厅走到接待室。接待室无光线,伸手不见五指,我记得廖恩放开我的手就被他打了一拳,我叫“廖恩打死人了。”接着他们一齐来打我,我妻子就在外面帮我呼救,并打卷帘门。大声喊“廖恩,你要把一个伤残军人打死吗?”又喊当地老百姓救命,在信访群众帮助下,把卷帘门都抽烂了,门才打来一条缝,我妻子李琼华从门缝进来,廖恩他们才跑了。我在混乱中也不知是谁,他打我时,我抓住他的体恤衫不放,他把衣服脱掉就跑了。我睡在地上,当我妻子和信访群众来时,我妻子李琼华当时也急昏了。120到来时,先抢救我妻子,我也到了医院,经医院x光片报道,我腰5椎体骨折,先仍在治疗中。


      公安派出所也在调查,但本身这件事就是有警察介入了殴打,最后的结论是否公正,可想而知。


      我是一个伤残军人,因邻里侵权纠纷要求政府协调处理,政府不作为,将我像太极推手一样推来推去,县委领导虽然有批示,但多次未落实,也没得到处理事情的回音,不得已我走上信访道路,要求上级领导督促解决我的邻里纠纷,没想到正是我抱有希望的上级及工作人员对我进行殴打,现致使我身受损伤你,并导致骨折,我内心无法平静,希望有关部门能公正对待我,对殴打我的凶手依法惩处,并赔偿我的一切损失。


                                                                                                                                              陈述人:梁上桓


                                                                                                                                             二零一零年九月


     


    梁上桓


     

Are you sure want to unlock this post?
Unlock left : 0
Are you sure want to cancel subscription?